Archive

Posts Tagged ‘e-Recording’

Apple Wins Big in Patent Case

August 28th, 2012 No comments

Wall St Journal, August 25, 2012 Apple Wins Big In Patent Case.

Among other findings, the jury at the US District Court found that many of the Apple patents were willfully infringed by Samsung. That means that federal Judge Lucy Koh now has the discretion to triple Apple’s damages award, said Brian Love, Santa Clara University School of Law, who has been tracking the case. ” This is a huge, crushing win for Apple,” he said.

READ MORE…

Share

MERS Janis Smith on Washington Supreme Court Opinion

August 17th, 2012 No comments

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT:  Jason Lobo

Phone: 703.652.1660

Email: jasonl@mersinc.org

Statement from Janis L. Smith, Vice President for Corporate Communications

MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. on the Washington Supreme Court Decision

 Reston, Virginia, August 16, 2012 – Today’s Washington Supreme Court opinion held that if Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) is not the promissory note-holder, then it is not considered to be the beneficiary for purposes of non-judicial foreclosures in Washington.  The court does not find that deeds of trust that name MERS as beneficiary are invalid and states that there is nothing in this opinion that prevents the parties from proceeding with judicial foreclosures.  Nor does it prohibit MERS from acting as mortgagee in the land records or a lenders’ use of the MERS® System to track changes in mortgage servicing and ownership of the promissory note.

As we have maintained consistently, MERS is an agent of lenders and their successors and assigns.  In fact, the opinion written by Justice Tom Chambers states: “nothing in this opinion should be construed to suggest an agent cannot represent the holder of a note.  Washington law, and the deed of trust act itself, approves of the use of agents.”  The opinion also states: “MERS notes, correctly, that we have [the Court has] held ‘an agency relationship results from…consent by one person that another shall act on his behalf…’”

MERS ceased commencing foreclosures in its name over a year ago, so this opinion does not impact its current operations.  The opinion will, however, create confusion for Washington homeowners while the trial courts consider its effect on pending cases.  We remain confident that MERS’ role in the U.S. housing finance system is valid and will withstand legal challenges.

For descriptions of cases and other materials pertaining to MERS’ business model and role in U.S. housing, please visit www.mersinc.org

###

MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. is a privately held corporation that owns and manages the MERS® System and all other MERS® products.  It is a member-based organization made up of thousands of lenders, servicers, sub-servicers, investors and government institutions.  Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) serves as the mortgagee in the land records for loans registered on the MERS® System, and is a nominee (or agent) for the owner of the promissory note.  The MERS® System is a national electronic database that tracks changes in mortgage servicing and beneficial ownership interests in residential mortgage loans on behalf of its members.

Share

MBA Says FHA and IRS 4506-T Allow E-Signatures 2012

November 13th, 2011 4 comments
Share

MBA Sends Letter To HUD To Accept e-Signatures

June 2nd, 2011 No comments
One Step Closer to a Complete e-Mortgage?We’re excited that with yesterday’s MBA’s announcemt that we have come a bit closer to a complete electronic and paperless real estate/ mortgage transaction. The MBA has sent a letter to HUD to permit e-Signatures on FHA Loan Origination Docs. This month we will be celebrating the 11th Anniversary of the e-Sign Act passed by President Clinton (June 2000) and look forward to having HUD join other Industry participants that currently have adopted and accept e-Signature technology, including real estate agents, title, escrow, closing agents, County Recorders and Secretaries of State. Read below article:
MBA News Link’s Sorohan, Mike ( June 2, 2011)
The Mortgage Bankers Association sent a letter yesterday to HUD, asking the agency to permit use of electronic signatures for all mortgage origination forms required by FHA.
The letter said eSignatures, acceptable under federal law and by FHA on certain documents, will help reduce processing issues that impair the homebuying process. MBA asked that FHA implement a revised policy accepting the use of eSignatures on all of its loan documents.

“eSignatures will reduce the volume of lost paperwork, reduce signature fraud, reduce the time required to close a loan and may lead to lower borrower costs,” the letter said.

MBA has long advocated modernization of FHA as part of its policy agenda. The letter noted the past 15 years has seen a trend toward automation of the loan application and underwriting process. Most lenders now have automated processes that allow applicants to apply online and to supply information to the lender electronically. Additionally, much of the processing is performed by lenders using online processing and underwriting tools. Ordering appraisals, credit reports and verification of deposit balances is frequently performed by automated, online processes.

“This automation makes it easier for the consumer to provide needed data to the lender, reduces the application to closing timetable, minimizes the potential for lost documents and generally reduces the costs incurred by all parties,” the letter said. “Lenders have experienced increased productivity and a reduction in costs after implementing internal automated processes.”

MBA said eSignatures would reduce costs for activities such as printing and mail couriers for both borrowers and lenders. “These benefits eliminate many of the annoyances of a paper-based process, including lost or inconsistent documents,” the letter said. “In addition, consumers would have greater flexibility and convenience within the home buying process because they would not have to change documents and related signing processes if they changed from a conventional loan to an FHA loan. All of [these] benefits ultimately result in lower costs for the consumer, as lenders pass on savings to remain competitive. Additionally, borrowers experience a more seamless and satisfying homebuying process.”

MBA said FHA’s acceptance of eSignatures would align the agency with other government entities, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which have been accepting electronic signatures on loan documents for several years.

“Conforming to accepted industry standards on all documents would expedite the mortgage process, reduce lender costs because processes could be replicated and fulfill consumers’ growing preference for conducting electronic transactions,” the letter said. “Notably, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Truth in Lending Act rules recognize the use of electronic records to meet disclosure requirements.”

The letter also noted most mortgage lenders that have automated the loan application process make use of electronic signatures for other forms and consumer/lender interaction, citing control mechanisms used conform to the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act passed by Congress and signed into law in October 2000.

“Accordingly, controls utilized to protect consumer and confidential data include encryption, tamper evident seals of e-signed documents, two-factor identity verification and other controls required under the ESIGN Act and industry custom,” the letter said. “MBA’s members are currently using such controls, and would continue their use in any FHA eSignature process.”

To address concerns raised by FHA about mortgage fraud, MBA said it believed processes built in the “e” world could mitigate many issues currently in today’s paper process.

“Many electronic mortgage systems incorporate additional borrower authentication capabilities that well exceed the standard of the traditional notary asking to see a driver’s license for validation,” the letter said. “For example, some systems prompt the borrower to respond to authentication challenge questions to establish true identity. In addition, tape recording, on line session recording, and audit trails further safeguard the e-signature process in the event of litigation. These safeguards are not only beneficial to the lender and FHA, but also provide convenience and protection to the homebuyer. Many commercial businesses have long adopted these security standards so consumer awareness and education would be minimal.”

Share

False Signatures Again-Is it Time For Lenders to Demand Secure e-Signatures?

March 18th, 2011 No comments

It’s hard to believe that after more than a decade of the passage the Federal E-Sign Act (June 2000) we are still reeling from headlines like this:

More foreclosure irregularities alleged in Maryland

Former law firm employee says over 1,000 deeds were recorded with false signatures
(Read Full Article)

You have to wonder what else it would take for the Industry to adopt secure and compliant electronic signatures, records, contracts, agreements and processing? ‘Robo-Signing’,  backdating and manipulative notarizations, people falsely ‘wet’ paper signing as imposters, etc.-astounding!

Now is the time for all good lenders, servicers and investors to reduce the ‘human error’ factor and protect all parties involved in one of the largest transactions anyone will make in their lifetime. identity verification, authentication, Tamper sealing, document integrity, secure e-Vaulting, etc.  No longer an experiment – the time is now to stop the Madness!

Share